I used to think Monster cables were a complete joke too until a musician friend pointed out that they have a lifetime warranty and very generous terms of exchange. One can essentially walk into any music store in the country and swap out the splinched cables for new ones, no questions asked.
Is he doing it right? Should the cables fail after every show? Shouldn't he just get better cables?
That was a big vague. He said "causing the problem" but didn't go into specifics about what that problem might be. Seems a bit too much like PR speak to me. Let's get it on the table: are these chargers a fire hazard?
Trademark restrictions are tied to the field of use.
If Google was releasing power tools and calling them Dremel, they would have a problem. But they can release a programming language called Dremel and are likely to be legally in the clear.
(Or such is my non-lawyerly understanding. I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice.)
((The reason people say that about not legal advice is that if you give legal advice and someone gets in trouble because of it - even if the advice was correct and the person misunderstood - you are liable for the consequences of that advice.))
But these are not products. They're internal code names and there's no chance that Google will ever be releasing these pieces of software to the public. Thus no possible trademark issues.
Citation? I the latest news I could find on google was that the nine or so class-actions were consolidated into one, and that Sony has filed a motion to dismiss, but nothing more that that.
About 440,000 public school buses carry 24 million children more than 4.3 billion miles a year, but only about six children die each year in bus accidents, according to annual statistics compiled the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
So yes, those six or seven only cover the students inside the actual bus.
Is he doing it right? Should the cables fail after every show? Shouldn't he just get better cables?