Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | yonixw's commentslogin

HN need community notes BAD.

> For your leveraged investments, pay yourself in refinanced cash when your investments appreciate and/or credit rates drop.

In other words: Gamble that (1) your investments appreciate, or (2) that you will find credit rates drop when convenient.

In 1 word: Gamble.

So, either you are rich and have spare money to gamble, which sure, might be beneficial against taxes. But you could also gamble against any other sector (stocks, housing, startups...)

Or, if you are not rich, just put it in the 401k (or eq).


The reason no one responds to this list is because it's just one big gish gallop

It's enough to see that you brought a link to the Israeli Military Censor to hint at a conspiracy, to understand who you're dealing with.

But even if you go into the list, you'll see at the top that those who were shot were in the middle of the battle, where Israeli forces were surprised, to the point of massacre alongside civilians. And there, it turns out, they didn't shoot to save themselves by the skin of their teeth, but simply wanted to kill journalists.

Also, a quick search shows that "Mohammad Jarghoun" ("מוחמד ג'רגון") was not a journalist at all, but a media worker, that according to the CPJ [1], during wartime he receives journalistic status. (Also not mentioned in AJ [2]. what a surprise...)

Another comment to the pantheon of "the most logical failures, in the fewest words". And then no one understands why the ICC will never consider such reports..

[1]: https://www.the7eye.org.il/501320

[2]: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/10/at-least-six-pales...


How does one say that a media worker is fair game, but a journalist is not? Both are classified as civilians under international law [1]. There are several airstrikes as the method of execution of these journalists as well. Good job cherry-picking the "favourable" examples. Also, I don't know what you're on about, but ICC is clearyly investigating Israeli war crimes of targeted journalist executions [3]. [1]: https://cpj.org/2023/10/journalist-casualties-in-the-israel-... [2]: https://cpj.org/data-methodology/ [3]: https://ifex.org/iccs-israel-palestine-investigation-will-in...


> Both are classified as civilians

Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest.

> Good job cherry-picking

Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1].

Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback.

Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"!

And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as.

> ICC is clearly investigating

Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest.

[1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/


[flagged]


Another "banger" comment that shows you did not read your sources links, here is one from the the wiki (Israeli Military Censor):

https://www.academia.edu/10481823/The_Israeli_paradox_The_mi...

Maybe your third comment will finally succeed...


Both researchers in that paper are Israeli residents. Do you have an independent report that corroborates their findings?


The wiki sources FROM YOUR LINKS, are suddenly not enough once they are against you?

Now now... one may mistakenly think you have some inconsistencies in your theory... and you out to revisit them first before demanding more..


The link corroborates my claim; the State of Israel does not protect press freedom.

I am asking you to cite a better counterarguement, if you want to disprove it. Or concede that Israeli journalists are regularly threatened by their government.


Am I missing something? How data centers in US/EU evaporating water thousand of miles from Iran affect it? Does it disturb the rain cycle in Iran or something?


The grandparent comment asserts that as data center roll-out continues, water scarcity becomes an even bigger issue globally.

The parent comment said DCs don't use water. This claim is easily proven to be incorrect.

But, correct, DCs outside Iran have little/no impact on the situation in Iran today.


If I asserted that datacentres dont consume clean water, then that would be incorrect, but I did not, I said water.

Water is evaporated and not consumed.

Also, I hope you apply same standard and scrutiny to the water impact of the food you consume.


Being overly pedantic doesn't help make your point.

And, yes, our food supply also has an impact on water availability in areas where food production occurs.


I am not being overly pedantic, I am merely pointing out the obvious fact that datacentres have +- 0 bearing on water problems in Iran, and even bringing them up in this conversation while ignoring corn or beef is ignorant at best and malicious at worst.


Iran will probably roll out data centres, as will other countries.

I wasn't speaking specifically US/EU.

A theocracy having that level of access to people's private info will be interesting.


LOL

Next one: Cloudflare has an edge in Israel. And has workers who were in Unit8200 before 1991 (per linkedin) and ISRALIES. Who uses Cloudflare? MANY MEDICAL ORGS. Also, Cloudflare is just like MITM (CDN SSL termination). So does ISRAEL SPIES read all your MEDICAL data?

> "To think otherwise is completely naïve" (real qoute from the article btw = no proof)

What a sham article. Trump's TruthSocial level. But hey, most upvoted today (440+ points). And no point on reporting to mods also, I just get copy paste reply.


This is not written in the article. Can you give a source? Since based on linkedin he was not in the army since 1991....

(And I mean any source for any of your assumptions...)


No. I was responding to the implied claim that mandatory service generally absolves a person of any form of complicity.


My guess is the 2-level separation. You WILL need to make some part in your system LGPL by using "Sidequest.js" tightly, but then expose very simple APIs (like /start /status etc..) that will stop the LGPL from "infecting" other parts, as they can replace the "linking" with anything that will support those simple APIs.

Which is a good way to get improvements other are doing that relate to your source code through LGPL's source exposing, while not forcing it everywhere (GPL case). Especially, for backend libs.

And since AGPL will essentially make it non viable for SaaS (as network separation won't do), LGPL is what left.


Layman here also, but I think you are correct about GPL and LGPL (this case), but not for AGPL which adds a requirement that: "... If your software can interact with users remotely through a computer network, you should also make sure that it provides a way for users to get its source"

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AGPLv3ServerAsUser


The AGPL license makes me so confused every time I read it. This "network effect" really is so deeply confusing.


This. The article suggestion will make parsers need lookahead support instead of simple state machine.

Is "key1" array of ["value1", "key2"] ? or string "value1"? We can't now until we find ':'.


Huh? The article does not suggest dropping the [] or did I miss something?


You will never catch me giving my AWS keys to AI agents. I don't need that stress.

> "Sorry Dave", I have made a recommended deployment to your 1 page blog app. It will contain CDN, WAF, 3 Load Balancers and a cross region S3 backup. My cost analysis says you will be billed 200K$ next month.


None of these require anything more than read access, and are for human assistance rather than replacement. If people are blindly accepting CDK updates without review, they probably shouldn't be in charge of IaC at all.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: