Yes it was so it would have prevented the exploit from loading. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

fukusa on Aug 7, 2015 | parent | context | favorite | on: Firefox exploit found in the wild

Yes it was so it would have prevented the exploit from loading.

Brybry on Aug 7, 2015 [–]

Do you know if NoScript with javascript disabled but iframes allowed and pdfjs enabled would have stopped it?

A vulnerability test would be really nice but I understand why it doesn't exist yet.

fukusa on Aug 7, 2015 | [–]

It would have stopped it. Js has to be active for the exploit script to run.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact