I believe the op is referring to the debate about wealth creation and distribution, where one could have a view that people in IT-startups like Zuckerberg are not creating wealth, just distributing it. And to distribute, you need to have someone to distribute FROM and someone to distribute TO. Now the comment should be more legible, I believe.

Ok, and yes that makes sense. The wealth creators don't have to be low paid drones though.

There was a recent discussion about startups and an increase in income inequality.

It seems some people think that there is no such thing as too much income inequality.