Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I didn't even read the article because I know there is no secret.

We don't hire the best people. We hire average people, some good people, some great people, some mediocre people, and some people who aren't very good at their jobs. Some of those mediocre and average people turn out to be great people after all. There's no secret to it. We like telling ourselves there is a secret because everyone likes to feel special and we think if we can mirror other companies that we think are successful then we can be successful just like they were.

In the end, you have people working with people. If you're fortunate, you get the right people interviewing the right person at the right time, and you get a great hire. At best, you can filter out the obviously bad ones. The rest, you'll find out about as you go. Some will surprise you, some will meet your expectations, and some will be disasters. Fire the bad ones; coach and mentor the average ones; keep track of the great ones.

Go build some shit with people you like building shit with and stop trying to figure out how to make hiring objective. You can't.



Incredible to me that someone would write such a lengthy comment based on a headline alone.


Good hires don't need to read the whole article


It's because so many posts on HN are cookie cutter - usually you don't need to read the post to know what the (same old) message is.

You know:

"Why my startup failed" (cause I built something no-one wants)

"Why we switched from this technology to that technology" (because the old one sucked but the new one will solve all our problems)

"How we built a startup that fixed hiring" (they didn't)

"How to hire great people" (no-one knows)

"Why we were rejected from YC" (can an idea be that bad?)

"Our experience of interviewing at YC" (we were scared, it didn't take long, we got accepted!)

etc etc


^^^ This post is awesome


I'd like to believe that both paxunix and andrewsteward wrote those comments after having read the article, but pretended like they didn't for the Internet points. Actually makes the comments a bit funnier.


Yeah, except this one is satire, and it's pretty good.


The truth is stranger than fiction.


If everyone is talking and no one is listening what is the point?


to generate a lot of data to sell microprocessors to people who make internet bots


And by doing that, completely missed the point of the article.


FYI, the article is satire. Not reading it will miss the point :-)


The article is satire, but I have no doubt that there are interviewers who intentionally use some of these techniques.


You probably should've read the article.


> Go build some shit with people you like building shit with and stop trying to figure out how to make hiring objective. You can't.

Yes you can. It's quite easy, make people build something small to get hired, that eliminates 99% of submissions who are just lying about their skills and posing and with code in hand, it's quite easy to decide who's full of shit and who isn't. Resume's are useless, demand code, real programmers program.


This is a good summary "Go build some shit with people you like building shit with and stop trying to figure out how to make hiring objective. You can't."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: