Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"React is simple to me, and that's why I like using it."

Horses for courses. The author is merely making the argument that you don't need react, and the GP comment didn't bother to read the argument before responding.



If you're going to tell me I don't need to use a library, it has to be way more convincing than, "Look how easy data binding it with native APIs! And it's not slow!" This is a weak argument in my opinion, and does nothing to address how removing abstractions will make my life easier.


That's a perfectly fair counterargument to the content of the piece, but the comment to which I replied had no such content.

The post didn't miss the point that "being able to just write the code once to render a UI from some state...is an incredible simplification of your code." It argued that you can do that without using React.


It argued that you can do that without using React.

I actually didn't see that argument being made - two way data bindings are not the same thing.

To achieve React's simplicity you either need to

a) Simply tear down the entire DOM and rebuild it - works for small UIs and I've actually used this myself before react existed

b) Implement something similar to the Virtual DOM that react has for any non-trivial UI that is too slow to rebuild on every user interaction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: