Not really, because optimizing for the wrong thing means you can make changes that hurt everybody and mistakenly think you've helped. Take Reddit's move of banning salary negotiations: control over how the surplus of the employment relationship is broken up was taken completely out of the hands of the employee. All employees (including women) are hurt by this, and yet a blinkered model that sees nothing but gender disparity would celebrate this as a narrowing of a gender gap. There are smart ways to address disparate-impact gender gaps, but insisting that feminism is the only lens through which to view a problem is not one of them.
In a salary-negotiation-banned situation, are you also typically prohibited from exchanging salary for vacation, while maintaining the same perceived total compensation?