Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The AssociatesMind article[0] on this is much better than the ArsTechnica link, and goes into detail in the legal dimension of this question. In this case, Kurt's situation likely constitutes assault; and this would also likely be considered assault even if you believe that Eichenwald lied about having a seizure, as I've seen some people question.

Here's the conclusion of that article:

"Just as someone can be held liable for a spring-gun despite being miles away, there is no reason to think that someone cannot be held liable for assault delivered electronically across great distances."

[0]: http://associatesmind.com/2016/12/16/can-you-sue-someone-for...



I hadn't heard of a spring-gun before. Basically this is a booby trap with a gun that shoots unattended when triggers.


I also happen to be a lawyer and not an automotive editor, which I think helps. ;)




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: