And the law in question specifically says *No person shall, for the purpose of e... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		timv on April 6, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Inspector General criticizes the IRS for seizing m... And the law in question specifically says No person shall, for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of section 5313 ... But the report indicates that the IRS made no attempts to determine whether the supposed "structuring" was done for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements, and simply ignored any evidence the showed that the pattern of deposits had a legitimate explanation.

wav-part on April 6, 2017 [–]

Is "for the purpose" predefined ? If not, we have only ourselves to blame for including such subjective terms in such serious matters.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact