Surely no vulnerabilities should be disclosed to the US government earlier than the public because it does abuse them to hack people's computers, and it doesn't make its own systems that would need protecting any more than private companies do. It's like giving a hacker group advanced notification.
Imagine the roles being reversed. Would we care if a Chinese chip maker notified Google before the Chinese government? I'm sure nobody on HN would be complaining. That makes it look like naive American-centrism.
Of course we wouldn’t think negatively of being told first; that’s the whole point.
Assuming you were trying to make a juxtaposition though experiment — what you should be asking is “Would China’s people care if a Chinese chip maker notified the US government first of vulnerabilities in their hardware?”
Imagine the roles being reversed. Would we care if a Chinese chip maker notified Google before the Chinese government? I'm sure nobody on HN would be complaining. That makes it look like naive American-centrism.