I've heard the argument that this is an effort to get some kind of "middle ground" before. The problem is there can be no middle ground here - only the illusion of one. Either law enforcement has the right to do X or they don't - if they are allowed to require a backdoor on skype, how could they not be allowed to require a backdoor anywhere?
The real scenario would be legislation justified with the argument "we want unlimited legal power but we promise to use it just a little" - and this kind of promise always turns out to be bogus.
The real scenario would be legislation justified with the argument "we want unlimited legal power but we promise to use it just a little" - and this kind of promise always turns out to be bogus.