Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree with the mentality that touch = consume and type = produce. The efficiency and imtimacy of user interaction of keyboards is simply unmatched with other competing input devices. Open-ness of platforms is secondary.


Conjecture: this is a tech-centric viewpoint.

I have quite a few lawyer and doctor friends who use tablets first (usually with a BT keyboard) and only break out the computer when they need it for some very particular reason.

If you don't need root on a beefy machine and/or Windows-specific software, then a modern tablet with a bluetooth keyboard gives you more than enough compute and all the applications you need to be productive. Often with a better UX.


It's an every-field-centric viewpoint. Every field that creates something is more efficient with a keyboard. You even just supported this point yourself.


>> usually with a BT keyboard

> is more efficient with a keyboard

...?


Bluetooth keyboard works great for me.


A bluetooth keyboard is a keyboard, I'm not saying it isn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: