So they could but... why should they?
> Wouldn't that be a much simpler and more secure parser than HTML?
No, because Markdown allows for raw HTML, so a compliant Markdown parser must also include a complete HTML parser.
So they could but... why should they?
> Wouldn't that be a much simpler and more secure parser than HTML?
No, because Markdown allows for raw HTML, so a compliant Markdown parser must also include a complete HTML parser.