Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a result of Japan environment (not only natural), they are too much and too concentrated as a result they can't live relaxed, they can only stress themselves. Few that born or arrive to a "comfort position" tend to exceed in any behavior, others whip themselves to the extreme.

That's why we read about people who die working too much, who close themselves in their room for months or years, they use big load of antidepressants, even more than the USA/UK (that are the top consumers of the western world) etc.

We develop any kind of things in response to our environment and we develop our society accordingly; that's why in cold countries we tend to have good welfare, reproduce less, are less violent than hot climate countries because cooperation is needed to survive, low density is needed because of low foods etc that's why in hot climate countries we tend to being far less cooperative, more violent and reproduce far more. That's also why in cold countries people tend to value space more than in hot one, that's why in some countries people dream an attic on top of a giant skyscraper in the city center and in others people dream a personal home immerse in the nature. And generally those countries evolve themselves accordingly.



Not convincing. The inner boroughs of London are as dense as Tokyo and a dream to live in. Your hypotheses have not faced adequate tests of falsification yet.


I was for a very short period of time in London and I do not see anything can be dreamed, starting for super-poor quality of ANY buildings... Mean quality I see resemble eastern-Europe ex-communist buildings of the poorer quality, just covered with moquette to hide the disaster...

Without speaking, of course, about pollution, traffic, noise etc. Perhaps for someone who have always live in a big town the level of service and public transport can appear really good, but if you ever live in riviera...


Hmm, how interesting. It looks like you mostly encountered social housing. Where did you stay and go?


Islington (live) to Fitzrovia (work), I see wood slabs covered with lean cement and moquette, buildings with only reinforced concrete directly painted or naked instead of proper well-finished plaster, panels and furnishings used as a quick way to cover unfinished/dirty things, moquette everywhere obviously dirty and crumpled... And no, they aren't social houses.

Of course MANY countries, highly developed included, have poor buildings quality and poor cleanliness in general, France where I live now is one of these for my Italian eyes, Sweden is worse than France etc but worse than London/Newbury/Carlisle (parts of UK a have visited a little bit more than a touristic trip) mean building I only see few Easter European buildings...

Oh, I do not like Paris or Berlin anything more eh! They are not a place to live IMO, however they have a less medium bad quality.


Interesting. I suppose I mostly lived in new build in by Tower Bridge and on the other side in Kensington. Solid homes all.

Or in older homes in the midlands and those were fine.


> too concentrated

Paris has a higher population density than Tokyo, and that's with about half of the city's area taken by parkland.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: