Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Dedicated (rented) offers similar performance improvements and cost reductions without the extreme upfront cost (obviously costing more over its lifetime as a result). But these days it really seems like a blind spot. Maybe it's just that I never completely jumped on the cloud bandwagon (or was running servers far before it got rolling), but I really haven't found a generic use case for cloud hosting. Planning infrastructure upgrades isn't rocket science; you'll have more than 10 minutes' notice to get a new machine. There are certainly many specific use cases for cloud hosting, but as a generic hosting tier I find it incredibly overused—and companies waste money and are forced to deal with unreliable performance (EBS i/o anyone?!) as a result.


GoGrid lets you mix and match dedicated and cloud servers, which offers the performance and value of a baseline of dedicated, and the flexibility of the cloud. I find it to be unparalleled.


Softlayer (my preferred dedicated host for years) does this as well. I agree that it's currently impossible to beat the combination of bare metal performance and cost efficiency with the ability to spin up cloud servers within one's own VLAN.


Rakckspace just launched something called Cloud Connect, which I believe does the same thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: