Agreed. The Economist has a bias towards free markets and free press but they are clear on those points. They do a lot of things to stay as unbiased as possible, like avoiding attaching a single name to a byline for a story.
Even Karl Marx read The Economist, for what it’s worth.
> They do a lot of things to stay as unbiased as possible, like avoiding attaching a single name to a byline for a story.
I don't actually understand this. I personally find that following specific authors whose journalism I find of high quality is a lot more efficient use of my time than following publications. Why does The Economist make this needlessly difficult, and what's the benefit of doing so?
Even Karl Marx read The Economist, for what it’s worth.