Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Impressive but imho he could take it one step further and instead of concrete on the other end, he could rotate the gear in the opposite way.


It would take more energy than the total energy of the known universe to turn the last gear.


Nah, I'm sure it would take less than 100lb-ft to rotate it, but it'll have fewer teeth when you're done.


*the gear in the middle


Sure, if you are inverting the gear ratios half way through...


Even without that, even 50 of these gears would take the mass-energy of something between a star system and a galaxy cluster to turn at any human-scale timeframe


Someone somewhere is working on an ICO based on this.


When all the slack has been rotated out, it would require a tremendous amount of force to rotate that last gear in reverse. After all, the system wants to amplify the gear speed from that end.


I think parent’s idea would work if the system was mirrored and duplicated. Then you could attach the two the them together with the stationary gears in the middle


Wow I like this idea, instead of concrete you really emphasize the point with another motor the opposite direction and the other end.


Yes, thanks for clarifying it :)


Actually not mirrored, just duplicated and joined at the concrete face. Mirrored would rotate in the same direction. Then it’ll “create two universe worth of energy” at the center of it.


So 10^100:1:10^100? I think the slack, friction losses, flex, material strength would all take out so much of the energy you'd get a tiny fraction of movement at the far end if any.


Yeah, but if you'd actually run the machine long enough it would simply destroy itself due to the force multiplier.


Sure but the point is that ‘long enough’ in this case is so long that we would never actually see it happen.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: