Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You mean a bad peace like 1939?


I'm thinking more like the bad peace of 1963, 1979, 2001, 2003, 2011, 2011 (again), need I go on?


Yes, but valuearb makes a good point— it is not always true that a bad peace is better than a good war. There are moments when timely, preemptive military intervention can avoid a more destructive conflict. (The problem is, of course, that those moments are often only obvious to us in historical retrospect.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: