The implications aren't automatically "there's nothing out there", more "this wa... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Tegran on July 25, 2020 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: When Hubble stared at nothing for 100 hours (2015) The implications aren't automatically "there's nothing out there", more "this was the wrong tool for the job".

ISL on July 25, 2020 [–]

True, but I doubt that anyone would have gambled that much Hubble time without working out the statistical sensitivity of the measurement.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact