These are pre-registration trials, which is a mechanism specifically designed to avoid this kind of cheating. Your comment also contains other, specific false statements:
> long term effects failed dramatically in animal testing.
That is incorrect.
> They use tests that can give false positives (PCR>26 cycles)
This false claim about how PCR works is a deliberate lie spread by conspiracy theorists. This is emphatically not how high cycle numbers of PCR are used.
> Or just look at symptoms that are similar to flu.
What does that mean?
> They do not have a proper (long term) placebo group (why not also use untreated patients as well).
They do that.
> Other factors with huge impact as health, habits, food, Vitamin-D.
That’s why you use large, randomised cohorts.
> Big pharma wants to collect "their" billions for their medicine.
I’m in favour of socialising big pharma companies. But this claim is still bullshit. Pharma companies can hike prices for working medication. They don’t need to invent fake medication that will be exposed in the long run and leads to company-destroying lawsuits.
> long term effects failed dramatically in animal testing.
That is incorrect.
> They use tests that can give false positives (PCR>26 cycles)
This false claim about how PCR works is a deliberate lie spread by conspiracy theorists. This is emphatically not how high cycle numbers of PCR are used.
> Or just look at symptoms that are similar to flu.
What does that mean?
> They do not have a proper (long term) placebo group (why not also use untreated patients as well).
They do that.
> Other factors with huge impact as health, habits, food, Vitamin-D.
That’s why you use large, randomised cohorts.
> Big pharma wants to collect "their" billions for their medicine.
I’m in favour of socialising big pharma companies. But this claim is still bullshit. Pharma companies can hike prices for working medication. They don’t need to invent fake medication that will be exposed in the long run and leads to company-destroying lawsuits.