With all of the LinkedIn and Groupon hype, as well as other companies like Pandora, why can none of them turn profits? These companies seem to hemorrhage money like no tomorrow, with investors only looking at revenue not profit. I'm curious of everyone else's opinions.
Maybe I'm cynical, but I think they are trying to grab a ton of money while the getting is good, knowing that their business model is not sustainable. They spend enormous sums of money on sales-staff (to get the deals from vendors) and many vendors say they are unhappy after the groupon goes live. Apparently most groupon-buyers are cheap one-time-visitors and the local vendor doesn't recoup their expenses.
The valuation metrics look at revenue growth, not sales and not profit. Wall Street loves the mystical growth metric and have cash by the fistful ready to stuff into firms that can show some sort of growth. Especially with hard-to-value tech companies, showing a strong number of users makes a marginally profitable (or even unprofitable) firm appear to be strong.
Supposing that the target is to attain the highest valuation, the right idea is to spend as much money as possible to show strong growth numbers. Then, when you hit the peak growth rate, sell it to the public!
When a more attractive professional network or daily discount site emerges, the value may dip. That being said, if the target is to make the most money, the easiest way is to ride the bubble
From what I've read Groupon makes a fortune. The others like LinkedIn are trying to convert their user base into a revenue stream without driving the users away.
The problem with many web 2.0 companies is that they don't have a clear revenue stream.
Pandora has been bent over by content owners. They're not powerful enough to dictate reasonable terms.
Groupon is waging all out war to dominate. They're hoping when the dust settles they'll own one of the richest markets in the world.