I see you have a “nochecks” version, what would be its use case? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		antman on April 11, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Temporal Tables PostgreSQL Extension I see you have a “nochecks” version, what would be its use case?

luto on April 11, 2021 [–]

It says right there in the readme: performance.

> This version is 2x faster than the normal one, but more dangerous and prone to errors.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact