> I don't describe myself as a "growth hacker" anywhere that I'm aware of.
Sorry, growth consultant. Maybe it's fair to say the two are interchangeable, maybe not. I'd at least assume the same when someone uses the word growth instead of revenue/sales/marketing. Might help to not pontificate about what the term "growth hacking" is if you don't want to be associated with it: https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer
> In any case, obviously a lawyer wrote the contract and gave an opinion that doesn't agree with your own expert legal opinion.
Where did I give my legal opinion? The fact is they had to settle to "undergo a review of its marketing materials to ensure that the information is accurate". This case wasn't about some doubt about legalese, but rather about how they presented themselves, hence the word "deception". It doesn't take a lawyer to know what that word means.
> More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better.
I think you'll understand why people are being critical of you now.
Sorry, growth consultant. Maybe it's fair to say the two are interchangeable, maybe not. I'd at least assume the same when someone uses the word growth instead of revenue/sales/marketing. Might help to not pontificate about what the term "growth hacking" is if you don't want to be associated with it: https://jamiequint.substack.com/p/growth-hacking-a-primer
> In any case, obviously a lawyer wrote the contract and gave an opinion that doesn't agree with your own expert legal opinion.
Where did I give my legal opinion? The fact is they had to settle to "undergo a review of its marketing materials to ensure that the information is accurate". This case wasn't about some doubt about legalese, but rather about how they presented themselves, hence the word "deception". It doesn't take a lawyer to know what that word means.
> More Zuckerbergs, more Travis Kalaniks. The more the better.
I think you'll understand why people are being critical of you now.