There's already a defense for truth, so I imagine the religious belief defense is there to avoid the Crown getting stuck in an argument about whether or not a given religion is "true", and the courts having to rule that it is not.
For a secular belief, you'd probably stick to arguing that it is true, seeing as you sincerely believe it to be true.
For a secular belief, you'd probably stick to arguing that it is true, seeing as you sincerely believe it to be true.