Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I guess when you use RAD Studio, it's probably better to go "all in" and use the Delphi language too. I tried C++ Builder once while I was working with Delphi, hoping it will be faster than Visual C++. Little did I know that the slow compile times are "baked in" into C/C++ family languages in ways that are hard to get around, so I was disappointed and went right back to Delphi. The Delphi language is (conceptually, not syntactically) not that different from other classical OO languages like C++ or Java, although it (thankfully in my opinion) doesn't have as many bells and whistles. But of course if you have lots of legacy code in C++ Builder, switching is probably not an option...


I don't really work with any legacy code, because I'm a new hire and build bespoke applications for customers as a one-man-team.

The company I work for has been using Borland since mid-90s, but now I wonder how I should break it to the company that I want to switch to Java.


You might miss the Delphi's AOT compilation though.

There are ways to get it in Java, but other than Graal, they cost just as much.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: