> I've already said elsewhere that having read their licensing terms and limits on what parts and how it can be used I would not touch QT with the wooden pole.
they can add whatever separate licensing scheme they want in addition to that but if a repo has LICENSE.LGPLv3 in it, you can use it under LGPL like every other OSS project (and those two repos cover by far most of Qt, you can pretty much build an entire OS userspace out of them).
the OSS licensing terms are the LGPL or GPL.
- https://github.com/qt/qtbase/blob/dev/LICENSE.GPL3
- https://github.com/qt/qtbase/blob/dev/LICENSE.LGPLv3
- https://github.com/qt/qtdeclarative/blob/dev/LICENSE.GPL3
- https://github.com/qt/qtdeclarative/blob/dev/LICENSE.LGPLv3
they can add whatever separate licensing scheme they want in addition to that but if a repo has LICENSE.LGPLv3 in it, you can use it under LGPL like every other OSS project (and those two repos cover by far most of Qt, you can pretty much build an entire OS userspace out of them).