Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or as Hamming says in his famous essay: He who works with a closed door is more productive today and tomorrow, but over time works on just slightly the wrong things to make an impact. But those with an open door are full of flitting and scattering and keep getting distracted, yet over time stay aligned with the field and are much more likely to do important work


Is there a link to this essay? I'm curious now. Edit: found it https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html


An HN perennial:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

Most recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28322153

At least 10 instances with some discussion.

The lecture is part of a series of lectures by Richard W. Hamming and is collected into a book The art of doing science and engineering : learning to learn

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2FF649D0C4407B30

https://www.worldcat.org/title/art-of-doing-science-and-engi...


Hey, thanks for sharing this post. I find this as an interesting one.


It's a matter of balance. Too much "open door" mentality, and you'll never achieve anything that distinguishes you from the rest. You won't create a new trend if you're always chasing the latest trends.


But for me finding that holy balance is in itself is tiring. some times the contents are no engaging and so it feels easier to skip through the slacking and get some work done. But in other times it is hard. The balance of this mechanism seems so dynamics.


I honestly think it's quite far fetched to connect the two - open door; and trendseeker.


But that's what open door means in this metaphor: "staying aligned with the field", i.e., following the mainstream trends.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: