Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One of those studies on the infected-then-vaccinated set (or, at least, an author of the study, being interviewed) claims “superhuman immunity” — effective against a spectrum of SARS viruses. Presumably the reverse (vaccinated-then-infected) is not true.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/09/07/1033677...

I will say that I do not particularly trust NPR any more; they have misreported events in direct contradiction of clear video and audio feeds of the events.



This post is very confusing to me. Why would the reverse not be true? Why did you post a source that you don't trust? Why just throw out an accusation like that, but with no specifics for people to follow up on and decide for themselves?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: