Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A lot of us have been using it for more than a decade. I'm going to look around, but $6 / user / month doesn't seem outrageous to me.


I'm sure they are banking on people just ponying up the cash because they've been with them for so long. It's basically mafia protection payments. Pay us or we'll break your legs (delete all your data).


Do you know anybody else who will give me free hosting for the next 12 years before demanding payment? I think I'm okay with moving once every ten or twelve years.


I wish most places would even let me pay for 10 years at a time like you can do with domain names, when it comes to peace of mind in the event of unexpected circumstances (which is incredibly relevant now given COVID-19, losing your job, ending up in hospital for a few months etc.)

How fragile is your infrastructure if one or two missed payments will wipe everything or even let somebody else take over your intangible identifiers because they're now 'inactive'.


As a personal rule I don't recommend anything "free" for long term use or anything you want to really depend on.


Not at all, they actually would be happy to get rid of all these low value accounts. They don’t want to maintain separate SKU, and given that this option is not available for 10 years, any potential revenue is so tiny, they just don’t want to bother.


$6/user/month is $6 * 12 * 100 = $7,200 a year if you have taken up their grandfathered offer of up to 100 accounts.

This is for a service which is basically identically (except in some ways where it is less functional) to their free offering but linked to a custom domain, and a service they told us they were planning for to be free forever.

I wouldn't mind paying something, but this charging per accounts is ridiculous for something that was free.

I would have used the service differently if I thought it was going to transition to a paid-for service.

For example, I have an elderly friend who I hooked up to the Google ecosystem using my domain because I thought it would be slightly easier to troubleshoot any issues he had if he had problems. He wasn't costing Google any more than if he had an @gmail account. (Presumably he brought in the same amount of money, rather: if he was profitable under a free account, then I imagine he was just as valuable on an Apps account).

He doesn't even use email, so the custom domain doesn't really help him. He will be just as happy to use a free @gmail account, but I will have to spend an afternoon some time in the next few months driving out to see him and updating his accounts and devices. And then doing the same the next weekend when I've missed something. And then doing the same for some other users.


I feel like it depends a lot on what you're using it for. I have a personal domain attached to mine with one or two email aliases that I use for a few things - I get maybe 5-10 emails a week there, so super low volume.

I feel like I would comfortably fit into any sane "free tier" they wanted to offer with some restrictions and low volume limits.

I have been planning to move more and more of my personal email over to my personal domain (currently mostly all running on my @gmail.com address), and eventually would have been happy to pay for the privilege once I started consuming more and more resources.

I'll see how I feel in 6 months if I've bothered to migrate over, but I might as well now look at alternative options.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: