Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a very good article and puts the other contributors in context.

The fact that there was so much discussion between the main players is underappreciated.

I strongly suspect that today GR would be a multi-author paper.



Accepted practice for listing authors on scientific papers is always changing. In older papers you often have people listed in an acknowledgement who, today, would absolutely be on the author list.


Because in the past the scientist's career wasn't contingent on getting on the author list.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: