Why not cross that bridge when those less clear situations happen rather than throwing about the false neutrality principle[1] as a defense now?

[1] Thinking about this https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/99574-we-must-take-sides-ne...

It's not about neutrality, it's about doing it the right way. In the end they only become a target of russia's cyber warfare.

There are better channels and ways of helping without making a civilian platform a war target.

That problem is a lot, lot smaller than the problem of people dying in Ukraine as they typed out that statement.

Officially supported funding would make them a legitimate target in war.

like how the US was supposed to send them $400 million in military aid? [0] Or the EU is sending them €1.2 billion?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Tr...

[1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022...

The US/EU have military backing. What does pateron have?

The Ukraine has disabled some human rights 7 years ago and is actively engaging in violent war with several human right violations for over 8 years now.

I don't see how even this situation is as clear as people make it out to be.