It is propaganda, the only reason you don't pay higher taxes is that car infrastructure is heavily subsidized compared to transit.

I certainly do pay taxes for the roads, bridges, and infrastructure.

When you factor in externalities you're living on borrowed time, debt and climate wise.

That's a different topic.

It's related since there's a very strong argument you (and Americans in general) aren't paying enough taxes and some things should be outright banned (single family homes on 75% of built land, in a country with an ever-growing population and a housing affordability crises and some of the highest per capita greenhouse gas emissions; maybe that percentage should be 50% or 33%)).

But that's political suicide to say out loud as a politician.

Propaganda can be true and factual; perhaps what the parent comment meant is that a minor detail can be exaggerated to dissuade / influence a voter's behavior.

> Propaganda can be true and factual;

so that's what's called a convincing argument then?

when done by a state-entity with the purpose to influence, yeah exactly.

biased does not mean incorrect. the devil is truly in the details, here.

There is no more room for roads - transit is the only alternative.