That’s very good. But what do I know about “Cure53” other than they are saying “... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		SV_BubbleTime on June 20, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: We are removing the option to create new subscript... That’s very good. But what do I know about “Cure53” other than they are saying “Yea, trust them bro”. Is Cure53 incorruptible? Would there be any blip in the world if they were not and Mull was really an NSA op? I’m not saying I don’t trust Mull over say, Nord. I am saying the nature of the whole thing is non-falsifiable with our existing technologies. We can only determine who was lying by looking back after an incident, and most are kept secret.

lillecarl on June 21, 2022 | [–]

So far their track record seems good enough. I mean if you have NSA on your threat model you'll have to take this into account... But most don't.

Foxboron on June 21, 2022 | [–]

cure53 has an impeccable reputation and delivered some of the best security analysis there is.

Most of them are also public and on github.

https://github.com/cure53/Publications

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact