You sound knowledgeable about this: I personally find that even when I’m having trouble controlling caloric intake as well as I’d like that sharp reductions in simple carbohydrates and sugars seem to help with weight loss even if my envelope math seems to indicate comparable total calories?
Is this just bad measurement or is there anything to that?
Sounds to me like it's due to the ease of digesting simple carbs vs complex carbs, which require more digestion to process. I think with complex carbs your net calories gained are actually lower than what the nutrition label says since they require some amount of calories to digest.
research show that people are apparently terrible at evaluating how many calories they take, even dieticians. by cutting more addictive food, it's possible that you're actually eating less than your otherwise would, even if the numbers don't seem to add up
Is this just bad measurement or is there anything to that?