> States would have to prove intention, which would be very difficult.
Its not all that difficult, there are plenty of specific intent crimes and states prove intention all the time.
> States cannot restrict interstate travel as mentioned in the Articles of Confederation.
Your link supports the existence of the right to travel, but that’s not in dispute; the right to travel is not an absolute; like other fundamental rights, the test applied in the strict scrutiny test, such that state actions impinging on it must be narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest.
Its not all that difficult, there are plenty of specific intent crimes and states prove intention all the time.
> States cannot restrict interstate travel as mentioned in the Articles of Confederation.
Your link supports the existence of the right to travel, but that’s not in dispute; the right to travel is not an absolute; like other fundamental rights, the test applied in the strict scrutiny test, such that state actions impinging on it must be narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest.