I'm not actually born/raised in US, only moved here 5 years ago. Thanks for the response as I wasn't aware of the gold seizures.
I would still say based on the practicality if you look at any cryptocurrency it would falter under the load of transactions as large as the whole US for example. So it's a bit early to bet the farm on any one of them. Also if a govt will support cryptocurrency they will create their own one so they can profit off their own ponzi, so to speak. They wouldn't be in favor of enriching Bitcoin whales just to take advantage of the 1s and 0s previously established in the btc Blockchain
The govt can create their own but would you trust them? Central bank digital currencies are simply a Blockchain version of fiat and comes with the same list of problems - centralized issuance (ie infinite printing), but much worse eg. Govt adding code to control how you spend - which can help control spending during inflationary times and absolutely kills any notion of a free market. What the govt wants isn't always what happens especially in the west.
Lightning network on Bitcoin already supports a higher throughput than visa
Sure but what if the US govt decided to launch a 51% attack on btc anyway?
I don't argue that blockchain tech will keep improving. I just say if it's going to be a currency of the future why do we have to spend money on it now? Won't we be able to create parallel blockchains to increase token supply? It's not an intrinsically valued asset, like buying a stock (which some have returned more money than speculative bitcoin purchasing). Why should the bitcoin believers tell everybody to buy it if there's nobody accepting it for payments?
I recommend googling Andreas Antonopolous videos on 51% attacks by nation states.
Re: parallel Blockchain- there are thousands of Bitcoin copycats since 2011. They're either dead or dying. See the top ten list on coinmarketcap over time. Point is that value will accumulate on what everybody agrees on and there's no way somebody's CrapCoin where they own 60% of tokens and dump it on the market will gain traction with it's inherent risks (security, centralization, lack of differentiation etc).
Bitcoiners themselves don't spend using Bitcoin yet but this change is happening as more and more people believe in it as something that holds value and isn't going to 0. It'll take time and I have patience.
A 51% attack is on specific counterparties, not the entire network. counterparties have other ways to punish such an attack: 1. Refuse repeat business, 2. Decrease credit rating etc.
I would still say based on the practicality if you look at any cryptocurrency it would falter under the load of transactions as large as the whole US for example. So it's a bit early to bet the farm on any one of them. Also if a govt will support cryptocurrency they will create their own one so they can profit off their own ponzi, so to speak. They wouldn't be in favor of enriching Bitcoin whales just to take advantage of the 1s and 0s previously established in the btc Blockchain