> this specific group in this specific location has an outsized number of people that are aiding terrorist organizations
Can you back that up with anything at all? That is a very dangerous accusation, and obviously plays to prejudice and racism regardless of intentions. It seems it should be stated very specifically and with clear evidence.
Edit: Someone else posted an article. I still think that nobody should make claims like that without being specific and having evidence. 64 people do not indict an entire community. What does the OP imply about DHS, for example?
> most immigrants are law-abiding and good citizens
Most people are law-abiding and good citizens, but some are not. It has nothing to do with immigration status. I happen to think that all people were created equal, regardless of where they were born.
The 63 number is deeply suspect as well. Were the 63 convicted? Were they even arrested? Or just deported without arrest, charge, or trial? DHS is well known for selectively hiring aggressive bigots, so their judgment on anyone carries negative credibility.
Can you back that up with anything at all? That is a very dangerous accusation, and obviously plays to prejudice and racism regardless of intentions. It seems it should be stated very specifically and with clear evidence.
Edit: Someone else posted an article. I still think that nobody should make claims like that without being specific and having evidence. 64 people do not indict an entire community. What does the OP imply about DHS, for example?
> most immigrants are law-abiding and good citizens
Most people are law-abiding and good citizens, but some are not. It has nothing to do with immigration status. I happen to think that all people were created equal, regardless of where they were born.