If you spent months doing research, is there a way you could share your findings besides broad stroke sweeping statements? All these discussions get cluttered with people offering few details about their investigative process but offering their conclusions. It doesn't serve to move the discussion forward because there are anecdotal experiences on both sides.
Exactly. There is no "he said, she said" to be had about software on deterministic turing machines. If you're attacking the product's QA as grossly inadequate, do some QA: post steps to repro a bug and get others to verify.
