Maybe this is a weird question, but how does Deno compare to Node when it comes to the various "languages that compile to JS"? For example Purescript, Fable, Elm, etc. does everything mostly just work, or should one stick to Node for those?
For languages that can emit clean ESM JavaScript source and don't depend on special tooling or runtime support you can totally drop the generated JS files into a Deno project and import them.
...but you're even _more_ on your own w.r.t. bugs, compatibility issues, and the basic assumption that everything will be running inside Node, and therefore trivially able to access e.g. `npx` or various scripting+automation tools.
Your best bet today is to run Node in your development environment, then use the generated code in a Deno service/CLI wrapper/etc. It's clunky, but you can get there.
Things mostly just work. Remember Node.js is mostly APIs on top of JS the language. If those tools compile to JS in the browser, they can compile to Deno. Deno is a more stabdards-based runtime than Node, it's closer to how the browser works.
