Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not about the legitimate/medical/supervised usage, it the recreational use that kills. Marijuana (MJ) is used a lot recreationally; if people to use MJ instead of Fentanyl the OD cases would not pile up like they do today.


It's just weird logic to say "X causes more deaths than Y, Y should be legal then".

E.g. car accidents kill more people per year than marijuana.

Does that mean driving a car should become illegal, and marijuana legalized?

https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauses.html

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/marijuana-deaths-2014_n_56816...


> Does that mean driving a car should become illegal, and marijuana legalized?

Honestly, yes. Or at least driving a car should require a much more strict licensing process. My daughter got a license during the pandemic and all that was required of her was driving around a parking lot once and then parking parallel. Skills which can be acquired in a couple of hours just prior to the test. Yes there is usually a written test as well, so there is some reason to believe people know what the basic road signs mean, but to let people loose on public roads traveling at 70 mph after a 5 minute driving test is just asking for widespread vehicle collisions.


That's not comparing like for like. For better or worse driving is considered to have huge social utility.

Fent addiction has huge negative utility for everyone - except its manufacturers and their investors.

MJ is probably more or less neutral.

In terms of broad social effects, refined sugar is probably the deadliest of all drugs, but its direct effects - especially in sodas - are much smaller than its indirect contribution to obesity and diabetes. And unlike a dramatic overdose death, it's very slow-acting. So it's barely considered a problem.


That is not supported by the research, marijuana use seems independent from opiod deaths (neither harming nor helping).


Hard line policing is the problem, not MJ/opiates itself.

If you get in as much trouble doing/buying/selling/etc MJ as Fentanyl, you might as well do the latter.

If MJ is legal, many would stick to that.

Same for MJ-to-alcohol: and the alc producers know it, they lobbied fiercly against legal MJ and when it became legal (like in Canada) they were the first to invest heavily in it.


Why not just do alcohol then? It's much stronger than pot, legal and cheap.


it's a lot worse for your health, for one. also, they don't have remotely similar effects


The argument though was that fent/meth users would stop using fent/meth if pot was legal.

If that argument is true, wouldn't fent/meth users just use alcohol since that is legal?

Alcohol is much better for you than meth and both are cns depressents.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: