Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The problem is that reducing spacex’s cost doesn’t reduce the customer’s cost…

SpaceX launches are way cheaper than competitors already. More competition would drive costs further down but it very much already exists.

A SpaceX launch costs 5% per kg of what a space shuttle launch cost. A 95% discount is pretty far away from “doesn’t reduce customers cost”.



How does it compare to the cost of a comparable rocket launch, ie, one without the known-to-be-wasteful [1] shuttle attachment?

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Space_Shutt...


SpaceX got contracts to launch a couple of GPS satellites for ~$80 and ~$90 million, compatible ULA launches were in the military budget for ~$420 million.

It’s not like buying a bus ticket so pricing is complex and difficult to compare but spacex is all around dramatically cheaper than the competition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: