Yes, it is unfortunate. 1% was a convenient number when the movement was formed.... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		sliverstorm on Jan 16, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: An Investment Manager's View on the Top 1% Yes, it is unfortunate. 1% was a convenient number when the movement was formed. It does not seem to be factually accurate.

scarmig on Jan 16, 2012 [–]

We are the 99.932%!

I wonder if the increase in inequality is scale invariant, or if you end up seeing some kind of kink at some point in it.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact