You're absolutely right. But I made that mistake without even thinking. This is how most people work - we don't think long and hard about each word that we use, and we use (often leaky) abstractions and analogies.
This just reinforces my point - choosing to ignore people only because they use the word "stealing" is not a good idea.
Actually, internally it was 'copied' across a network from one computer to another. This is indisputable. Computers do this well so you're correct that it's not just a 'nice' imitation, it's a 'perfect' imitation.
Now we've corrected your choice of words from 'took' to 'copied', can you please make your argument again but this time using the correct word?
I just wished to point out that you were deluding yourself with semantics.
I'm not for or against piracy.
On a personal level, I am for being able to pirate other people's work, but against my own work being pirated. That's not hypocritical: I value increasing my capital.
But on a non-personal level, my belief is that a file is the medium of ideas and that when this is copied it (a) strengthens the ideas by increasing their cheap supply in a culture, and that (b) due to the increased supply the demand at high price points has the potential to shift down, while the demand at low price points has the potential to shift up because of increased cultural interest.
By saying "taking" you've already given them the wrong question.
If you ask a random person "what do you call the act of imitating something without paying for it", they'd answer "huh?", or "art".