If this is a reply to me, I think you missed the point I'm making here. I don't care if we can prove other people are sentient or not.
My point is that it may well not matter whether a thing is sentient or not if a well-trained algorithm can achieve the same or better results as something that we believe is sentient.
My point is that it may well not matter whether a thing is sentient or not if a well-trained algorithm can achieve the same or better results as something that we believe is sentient.