Worse. It was written by a low-quality content mill that is one step above spam.
The Germany 'ban', for example? A German newspaper asked the Federal Commissioner if it could be blocked, and he answered "In principle, it could be", then followed with a bunch of boring nuanced qualifications that nobody wants to read, like the fact that in Germany this would be a state-level decision, or that they have just asked the Italian authorities for more information.
Was this articlr writen by ChatGPT itself? It sure reads like it...