(I did not downvote the parent comment.)

> The EU has a higher GDP than the US (albeit they're very close).

In case anyone was curious, the IMF currently believes that the US's GDP is 50% higher than the EU's = 40% higher per capita.

https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/EU https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/USA

You're right per capita, but as a total market the EU is larger.

It's literally not though. EU has a higher population and lower total GDP.

You’re right, I was looking at 2015 data

US GDP per capita: $75K (PPP), $75K (nominal)

EU GDP per capita: $54K (PPP), $37K (nominal)

It's not even close.

Waymo is years ahead of anything coming out of Mercedes.

Which cars can you buy with Level 3 self-driving in the US? What states allow Waymo Level 3+ driving? Yes I can get around the SF Finance District if I sign up to be a beta tester with Waymo, and they do run in Pheonix, but Mercedes has full Level 3 signed off in Nevada. In fact Mercedes have said they will take ownership of self-driving accidents while Tesla for example points it to the individual driving.

We're talking about the engineering capability, not how the product is monetized. If a company had flawless L5 but it was exclusive to millionaires driving cross-continent, it would be impressive engineering albeit a niche business.

>Mercedes has full Level 3 signed off in Nevada

I wonder why they're testing in Nevada and not the EU. Could it be that the EU stifles innovation with its strict laws?

Or maybe it was actually started to roll out in Summer last year in the EU?

Mercedes Level 3 cars expected to be priced at $50k, competitive with Tesla.

https://etsc.eu/europes-first-cars-with-level-3-automated-dr...