Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sundar was chosen following a series of failures by megalomaniacal executives Larry had appointed/approved to head various departments, including Andy Rubin, Tony Fadell, and Anthony Levandwoski. Sundar was a move in the opposite direction.


Don't forget Vic.

It's somewhat amazing how many failed, some nearly sociopathic, almost-CEOs Google had.


Ironically, Vic was was empowered to counter a similar panic an upstart more formidable than OpenAI. He brought a bold vision alright, but that's not sufficient to be a good leader.


What was Vic's bold vision?


Integrate Google+ into every product made by Google.


That was a bold vision. May Vic's legacy rest in peace w/ G+.


Aren't CEOs supposed to be sociopaths? (Asking for a friend.)


Ugh

Overly opinionated people like that could thrive under Jobs, who was the biggest opinion setter, which made them fight for the most important things while getting a pushback on the most controversial areas and not waste time with minor stuff

Take that and they start going crazy (yes I'm talking about Johnny Ive)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: