Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I would argue that the 'Instant Ink' service as a whole is somewhat shady and an environmental disaster, but I agree that this particular part is an obvious outcome that shouldn't really be controversial.


it isn't controversial that a company would rather destroy a resource than let someone have it, but some of us strongly oppose this


Don't subscribe to the service if you don't like the business. HP certainly pushes instant ink, but afaik, all of the instant ink printers are also usable with customer owned cartridges (although some printers won't use 3rd party cartridges).


I mean, I don’t. But I don’t think they should be allowed to something so senselessly wasteful at all. If the business doesn’t work without trashing perfectly good ink it shouldn’t be a business.


They are not destroying any resources, you are free to cut the cartridge open and use the ink or electronic components as you like.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: