Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Upvoted. Spot on. It's nowhere near as dynamic as a basic dynamic language. So much so that I just don't bother with dynamic in C# (I also don't bother with nullable types and a load of other features as well but that's another story).

However, I don't find that a problem. I tend to prefer the correctness of statically typed languages these days.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: