Maybe MIT approaches post 2000 engineering with a solid foundation of analysis that creates both a beautiful creation process and reliable beautiful software artefacts. But what I observe is a never ending stream of partial doc reading, partially out of date, with random attempts until it looks it won't fail it left running for a few minutes.
Ability to deal / reflect with unknowns for engineering is of great value, but so far I've never seen that in office.
Ability to deal / reflect with unknowns for engineering is of great value, but so far I've never seen that in office.